EisPiraten.com Forum Index EisPiraten.com
San Gabriel Mountains Forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CA-39 (San Gabriel Canyon Road)
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EisPiraten.com Forum Index -> News & Conditions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lesper4



Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 72
Add Comment
Show Comments





PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:36 am    Post subject:  Reply with quote

this is great for us cyclists but couldnt they just run the sweeper up and back once a year?  Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elwood
NHPS Member


Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Posts: 463
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would appear to me that someone has deleted a message that reflects an understandable but absolutely wrong interpretation of my comment. An urban burrito is simply slang for one of the multitude of soiled diapers left trailside, roadside, creekside, etc. Other than the ethnic specificity of the foodstuff referenced, it is not a slur against any group. Ill be sure to refer to them in the future as urban kreplach or urban blintzes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HikeUp
Likes Beer


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 2786
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Pasadena, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget the dosa. Everyone has a the right to be offended Very Happy
_________________
Hike up! The world's about to end. Flickr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hikin_Jim
Stove Droid


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 4594
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't be deceived.   Hwy 39 is a communist plot.

HJ
_________________
Backpacking stove reviews and information: Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ARM



Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Wrightwood

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elwood wrote:
It would appear to me that someone has deleted a message that reflects an understandable but absolutely wrong interpretation of my comment. An urban burrito is simply slang for one of the multitude of soiled diapers left trailside, roadside, creekside, etc. Other than the ethnic specificity of the foodstuff referenced, it is not a slur against any group. Ill be sure to refer to them in the future as urban kreplach or urban blintzes.


Well thanks, Elwood, I did misunderstand your intent, along with another commenter it seems. No harm done. It's too bad that the issue I raised is such a hot button. It would be nice to someday find a solution to the problem of having a limited amount of solitude and bliss surrounded like an island by so many who want to go see and play in it.

It seems that we only have a few choices though for the San Gabriel, San Bernardino San Jacinto Mtns. We can either let them go, keep everyone out, or keep putting on limits to where and how many can go in... Unless, does anyone know how to make an island disapear and move through time?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robnokshus



Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 119
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Burbank

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Well thanks, Elwood,  I did misunderstand your intent, along with another commenter it seems.


Well, if you're referring to me, I did not misunderstand the comment. In fact the first thing I alluded to was that people are upset with dirty diapers and mountains of trash. YOU were the one that suggested that people were biased about the way people LOOK. I suggested that it wasn't their looks that folks object to, but their behavior. Big difference.
_________________
"You can't have everything, where would you put it?" Steven Wright
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
EManBevHills



Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 387
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: West Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone have any more details on the "issuing tickets to pedestrian thing"?
And what about cyclists?
_________________
"Hang on St. Christopher on the passenger side open it up tonight the devil can ride. Hang on St. Christopher with a barrel house dog, kick me up MT. BALDY throw me out in the fog" -- Tom Waits
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Hikin_Jim
Stove Droid


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 4594
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EManBevHills wrote:
Anyone have any more details on the "issuing tickets to pedestrian thing"?
And what about cyclists?
 I think that was more about fire closure than Hwy 39 itself.  Anyone got anything further on that?

HJ
_________________
Backpacking stove reviews and information: Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hikin_Jim wrote:
EManBevHills wrote:
Anyone have any more details on the "issuing tickets to pedestrian thing"?
And what about cyclists?
I think that was more about fire closure than Hwy 39 itself. Anyone got anything further on that?

HJ


http://glendoramtnroad.blogspot.c...ort-from-board-of-highway-39.html

Its $200 according to "yeahian". That wasnt the only I read, but the only one I remember about cyclists. It is defintely about them not wanting the public on the road while they work....although they make talk about their legal liability in case something goes wrong for you. That and they dont need any vandals going up there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hikin_Jim
Stove Droid


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 4594
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AW wrote:
Hikin_Jim wrote:
EManBevHills wrote:
Anyone have any more details on the "issuing tickets to pedestrian thing"?
And what about cyclists?
I think that was more about fire closure than Hwy 39 itself. Anyone got anything further on that?

HJ


http://glendoramtnroad.blogspot.c...ort-from-board-of-highway-39.html

Its $200 according to "yeahian". That wasnt the only I read, but the only one I remember about cyclists. It is defintely about them not wanting the public on the road while they work....although they make talk about their legal liability in case something goes wrong for you. That and they dont need any vandals going up there.


That was actually for "long boarders," but I get the idea.  Sounds like they're serious about it.  

Is there a sign to that effect?  I don't recall ever seeing one.

HJ
_________________
Backpacking stove reviews and information: Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike P
Math Rambo


Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 959
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Glendora, CA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 8:46 am    Post subject: Caltrans on Hwy 39 Reply with quote

From today's Tribune:
Hwy 39

I hope Caltrans will abandon only the closed section.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davantalus



Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Posts: 203
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Santa Clarita, CA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Road to nowhere, meet Bridge to nowhere?

I get that it's costly - but don't easily maintainable roads soak up the cost of the expensive ones?  Isn't Highway 2 a million times more expensive?

Would Highway 2 get the same treatment if there weren't more people ready to make a fuss for it? But then I guess The 2 goes through... hang on...

Where's PIA when you need him?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
simonov
Tacticool


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1068
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Truckee Meadows USA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today's "environmentalists" aren't your father's environmentalists.

Quote:
Longtime cabin owner and environmental activist Glen Owens was dumbfounded over what some are calling a Caltrans trial balloon.

"Why would a state agency try to shirk its responsibilities and then think another government agency would take those over?"


Quote:
Recently, Azusa businesses, cabin owners and some environmental groups lobbied for repairing the 4.4-mile section. They say having full circulation into Wrightwood and its ski areas, and into the high desert and La Canada Flintridge area, will bring more shoppers to the foothill cities of the San Gabriel Valley.


Since when do "environmentalists" lobby for more highways through the forests and mountains?
_________________
The future had clearly gotten out of hand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Z
<3 <3 <3 Snow


Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1376
Add Comment
Show Comments





PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

these people are full of shit.

play around with google maps. Of course the time estimates aren't perfect, but from downtown Asuza to downtown Wrightwood via 210 and 15 ~ 65 minutes.

From Asuza to Crystal Lake = 37 mins.
4.4 closed part of 39 = ???
From Islp Saddle to Wrightwood = 25 mins.

How is opening the end of the 39 really going to add business to Azusa again?
_________________
http://hikingscience.blogspot.com/
http://socalhikes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AlanK
The Man


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 1069
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Glendale, CA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Z wrote:
How is opening the end of the 39 really going to add business to Azusa again?

People will flock from Azusa to the Starbucks that will go in next to the restroom at Islip Saddle.  But, to get there they will want to fill up at the Starbucks on Foothill near Azusa Ave.  That will be a boost to the local economy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EManBevHills



Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 387
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: West Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 7:34 pm    Post subject: HWY 39 from the LA Times 1/28/12 Reply with quote

http://www.latimes.com/news/local...es+-+California+%7C+Local+News%29
_________________
"Hang on St. Christopher on the passenger side open it up tonight the devil can ride. Hang on St. Christopher with a barrel house dog, kick me up MT. BALDY throw me out in the fog" -- Tom Waits
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
obie



Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 339
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Costa Mesa

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Odd touch they added about Adam speaking "broken English."  My conversations with him led me to believe he's anything but an "immigrant" with language issues.  IIRC Adam told us once that he used to be in "banking",
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Taco
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 5546
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Stuntin in the trap son

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Broken English my ass. They owe Adam an apology for that comment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hikin_Jim
Stove Droid


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 4594
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:57 pm    Post subject: Re: HWY 39 from the LA Times 1/28/12 Reply with quote

Fascinating.  First they're going to re-open the long-closed upper section, and now they want to abandon not only the upper section but the entire route.  

Maybe CalTrans is bipolar?

HJ
_________________
Backpacking stove reviews and information: Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Taco
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 5546
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Stuntin in the trap son

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds like the government to me!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
everyday
Desert Runner


Joined: 15 Mar 2011
Posts: 455
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Yosemite!!! HA!

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WTF? he speaks perfectly fine english.  Shocked
_________________
....SQUIRREL!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
moppychris



Joined: 07 Sep 2009
Posts: 87
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: The Orange County

PostPosted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well here in LA, if you don't have a latino or asian accent, you are the odd one out. Thus, Adam appears to have "broken english".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CalTrans is the biggest slumlord in the state and is the one that needs to be abandoned

http://www.caltranstenants.com/slumlord.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:35 am    Post subject: Hwy 39: E Fork Rd to Crystal Lake closed for several weeks Reply with quote

http://caltransd7info.blogspot.co...el-canyon-road-sr-39-closure.html

"Caltrans will continue to restrict access to San Gabriel Canyon Road (SR-39) due to mud slides and road washouts caused by early January rains in the Cabin fire burn area in the Angeles National Forest.  The closure is just north of East Fork Road, 13 miles north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210).  The closure is expected to be in place for several weeks.

Caltrans damage assessment coordinators and geotechnical technical team are in the process of:

   Developing repair solutions and hiring a contractor to rebuild three damaged sections of highway.
   Clearing debris basins alongside the highway for future storms.
   Rebuilding and stabilizing the slopes above and below the highway.
   Securing permits from Angeles National Forest, California Fish and Wildlife, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and US Waterways to begin repairs. "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sean
Cucamonga Man


Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 1022
MYPAGE
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Monterey Park, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a good example of what I was saying in the other thread about the lack of private development in the forest resulting in a lack of government resources devoted to protecting it. If there were a small village in the Crystal Lake basin, then these government agencies would be hearing an earful on a daily basis from hundreds of irate residents clamoring for critical, public services like simply maintaining the debris basins and storm channels. Instead we have one small business owner, weeks after the fact, pleading with hiker-tourists for help in dealing with several different government entities who clearly see little urgency in the matter.
_________________
Hiking Photos On Facebook
Hiking Videos On YouTube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This one is pretty simple IMO....and not a good example. A storm on a recently burned sizable area ruined a piece of Highway 39. Theres no way anyone is going to fix anything until after the rainy season, nor should they. And with Caltrans operating under the assumption of El Nino saturated storms coming, that makes it 101% they wont move an inch on it, nor would they if there were a small village. The section from Crystal Lake to Highway 2 would be a better example, but there are plenty of voices supporting the fixing of that section already.

The operator should have known this would happen...and will happen again.
The FS plans to renovate the old campgrounds and spend millions....so it is in fact the public that recognizes the importance of Crystal Lake for recreation and wants the road opened. Its just that the history of Caltrans  is ignoring millions of people and not investing in mountain highways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sean
Cucamonga Man


Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 1022
MYPAGE
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Monterey Park, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AW wrote:
And with Caltrans operating under the assumption of El Nino saturated storms coming, that makes it 101% they wont move an inch on it, nor would they if there were a small village.


Yes, they would. A village buried in snow and isolated from the rest of civilization would be considered a public emergency. They would either fix the road within days, evacuate the village, or indefinitely supply necessities by chopper. I'm guessing they'll fix the road as quickly as possible.
_________________
Hiking Photos On Facebook
Hiking Videos On YouTube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2016 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sean wrote:

Yes, they would. A village buried in snow and isolated from the rest of civilization would be considered a public emergency. They would either fix the road within days, evacuate the village, or indefinitely supply necessities by chopper. I'm guessing they'll fix the road as quickly as possible.


Crystal Lake was supplied by auto from the lower end. In the areas where the highway was gone, they put the supplies on wagons...then switching back to auto for the next section,etc. By that year of course the Solider Creek development had been long evacuated from the Curve fire.

Yeah, they fixed the lower section ASAP...as in 2 years lol. Within days? Impossible....and to top it off it was raining everyday for months and got worse and more highway defects. These clowns are planning for 1997-1998...Feb to be 13 inches of LA downtown rain. And if that happens, this defect will be just one of many.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dima



Joined: 12 Feb 2014
Posts: 181
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has anyone heard anything about when the road to Crystal Lake will reopen? Don't want to get into a political discussion here, just want to know about the road :)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Early May?

http://caltransd7info.blogspot.co...el-canyon-road-sr-39-on-mend.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Schedule to open Friday 4/29 at 3:30 pm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
tekewin



Joined: 11 Apr 2013
Posts: 662
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Aliso Viejo

PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the update.
_________________
http://ironhiker.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Slowest_Hiker



Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 129
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Sierra Madre

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:14 am    Post subject: Caltrans considering a new plan to reopen Highway 39 Reply with quote

Caltrans considering a new plan to reopen Highway 39 all the way to Wrightwood

Quote:
Congestion in the North, West and East forks of the San Gabriel River popular recreation spots during summer and fall would be relieved by completing the loop to Highway 2, moving people and traffic through Wrightwood, a quaint mountain town, and connecting to the high-desert communities.

_________________
Slowest_Hiker is in better shape now and actually passes other hikers on the trails. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psykokid



Joined: 18 Mar 2016
Posts: 52
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: San Gabriel

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

About dam time.. Would be nice to not have to drive all the way around to access BP and the environs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Z
<3 <3 <3 Snow


Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1376
Add Comment
Show Comments





PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ridiculous. There is no benefit to access to Wrightwood, as it is already faster to take 210 - 15 - 138 to get there than it would be up the slower, curvy, steep mountainous 39 - 2 route.

The only benefit would be a 10-20 minute drop in time for people in Azusa / Glendora to get up to the upper ACH trailheads (i.e. Waterman, Kratka, Islip, etc...). Other cities west it would be faster to access ACH from La Canada anyways.
_________________
http://hikingscience.blogspot.com/
http://socalhikes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sean
Cucamonga Man


Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Posts: 1022
MYPAGE
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Monterey Park, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Z wrote:
Ridiculous. There is no benefit to access to Wrightwood, as it is already faster to take 210 - 15 - 138 to get there than it would be up the slower, curvy, steep mountainous 39 - 2 route.


What about during rush hours? A lot of people take the AFH to Palmdale to avoid the 5 freeway. Maybe some would take 39 to bypass Cajon Pass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Z wrote:
Other cities west it would be faster to access ACH from La Canada anyways.


Relying on one narrow mountain highway, when you have another one built is plain loco. Another one whose missing segment that is technically illegal to be on I should mention.

Id say a deal is in order, where Caltrans agrees to spend $X each year on the highway 39, and any unused funds get saved. If it does rain this year, you can forget about the last segment, and the possibility of a long closure of the segments affected by the recent fires....but if we dont get any damage by April, they should start up Highway 39.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hikin_Jim
Stove Droid


Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 4594
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You've got to be kidding.  Hwy 39 is technically infeasible unless you're going to be willing to spend a lot of money -- as in rebuilding the highway nearly every year.

The West face of Mount Islip is one big land slide.  Well, OK, not quite, but pretty close.  It's constant rock fall along there.  

If they really need a highway in there, they need to go over Windy Gap and abandon Islip Saddle as a route.

HJ
_________________
Backpacking stove reviews and information: Adventures In Stoving
Personal hiking blog: Hikin' Jim's Blog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Z
<3 <3 <3 Snow


Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1376
Add Comment
Show Comments





PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just because something is partially built, doesn't mean you have to keep it up. It doesn't make financial sense. The phrase "cut your losses" applies here.

These mountain roads aren't intended to be congestion-reducing throughputs, they are to provide access to nature. Constant costly upkeep of upper 39 in order to save some people 10 minutes off their drive to nature is not something taxpayers should paying for. If you wanted to make it a toll road, maybe. But I doubt that would work as the "demand" for it is fake.
_________________
http://hikingscience.blogspot.com/
http://socalhikes.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AW
Canyon Man


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 1623
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: North Hollywood, CA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Z wrote:
Just because something is partially built, doesn't mean you have to keep it up. It doesn't make financial sense. The phrase "cut your losses" applies here.

These mountain roads aren't intended to be congestion-reducing throughputs, they are to provide access to nature. Constant costly upkeep of upper 39 in order to save some people 10 minutes off their drive to nature is not something taxpayers should paying for. If you wanted to make it a toll road, maybe. But I doubt that would work as the "demand" for it is fake.


We'll see. They thought they were going to get away with closing Hwy39 at West Fork and then they thought they were going to get away with closing Hwy39 at the Valley of the Moon. A whole generation of wasted time, but just in time for the eastern half of the forest to be saved from the Station Fire.

Cant blame them I guess...they got away with not fixing GMR for 30 years with the same lies. And then a few months later its lasted for 10+ years with no incidents thus far. Granted it might be confusing which was the unnecessary one..GMR or Hwy39? Hwy 2 or Hwy 39? If we are going by cost, Hwy2 should have been abandoned a log time ago. In fact, the #2 from Little Jimmy eastward with that crackerjack coating they spent millions on looks like someone travelled it pogo-ing every which way with a jackhammer(OK it was likely the rock runs). Is the centerline still visible?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gene



Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 93
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: South Carolina

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It may be a straw man ploy to get funding:

"We need a lot of funding to fix this route, but hey, we can save $.02 by cutting thru a protected area."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RichardK



Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 645
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Florida East Coast

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read the article carefully. It does not say that any course of action is definite.

Quote:
We are preparing the engineering design and environmental studies in support of this effort, said Lauren Wonder, a Caltrans spokeswoman, in an email.


They aren't actually doing a design or studies. They are just "preparing" to do them.  It sounds like a smoke screen. The various city governments in the area are clamoring for the road to re-open. So, Caltrans makes like it is doing something just to shut them up.

If anything half way concrete appears, expect an avalanche of environmental law suits over the impact to Nelson's Bighorns.

I will be dead of old age first.
_________________
"It is our task in our time and in our generation, to hand down undiminished to those who come after us, as was handed down to us by those who went before, the natural wealth and beauty which is ours."

President John F. Kennedy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
robow8



Joined: 12 Oct 2016
Posts: 18
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Fontana

PostPosted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother is a civil engineer for caltrans. I'll have to ask him about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hayduke



Joined: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 29
Add Comment
Show Comments




Location: Cedar Mesa

PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Enjoykin96 wrote:
If you want to study English, this website is perfect for the beginners. It contains simple rules and examples that will help you to completely understand any topic http://edit-it.org/blog/quick-way-to-get-definite-article

This doesn't sound spammy at all.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    EisPiraten.com Forum Index -> News & Conditions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum

"Their only motive was a great ideal; this was what linked together mountaineers so widely dissimilar in background and so diverse in character."
Maurice Herzog, Annapurna